Every Weight Built to Breach
Most "AI-powered" security platforms are thin wrappers around someone else's frontier model. We took the harder path. Dagger is Assail's proprietary 14-billion-parameter model, trained from the ground up for one mission — finding and exploiting vulnerabilities across APIs, web applications, and mobile applications. Every parameter exists to think like an attacker. Not a chatbot with a Burp Suite plugin. A weapon.
ARES V1.0 DAGGER
The Ares Proprietary Model
Accelerates Exposure Validation and Remediation Through Exploitation
TEAM
Every vulnerability class in the OWASP API Security Top 10 — discovered, exploited, and validated through real attack paths.
FEATURES
Ask a vendor a single question: "What model is your platform actually running?" If the answer is GPT, Claude, or Gemini — with a custom prompt — you are paying enterprise security pricing for consumer infrastructure that was never designed for the job. Here is what you actually get when you choose a proprietary, purpose-built model over a frontier wrapper.
Date
Frontier models are trained to refuse offensive security work. Vendors wrapping them rely on system prompts, jailbreaks, and fragile workarounds that break every time the upstream model updates its safety layer. Dagger was trained for this work. It will fingerprint your stack, enumerate your endpoints, chain your vulnerabilities, and synthesize working exploit payloads without a single refusal, hedge, or "I can't help with that." Because it was never trained to.
Date
When you depend on a frontier wrapper, you depend on every decision the upstream provider makes — pricing changes, deprecation timelines, regional availability, content policy revisions, and outages that cascade through every downstream product. Dagger runs in infrastructure we own and control. There is no upstream provider. There is no third-party rate limit. There is no consumer-grade safety filter sitting between you and the work that needs to be done.
FAQS
Find Some quick answers to the most common questions.
Why did Assail build a custom model instead of using GPT-4, Claude, or Llama?
General-purpose LLMs are trained to refuse offensive security work. Every time you ask one to generate a payload, chain an exploit, or reason about post-exploitation, you're fighting the model's safety training — getting watered-down output, refusals mid-engagement, or hallucinated CVEs that waste your team's time. Ares' proprietary model was purpose-built for offensive operations from the ground up. It doesn't refuse legitimate red team work, it doesn't hallucinate vulnerabilities that don't exist, and it reasons about attack chains the way a senior operator does — because that's the only thing it was trained to do. You're not renting a fraction of a model built for everyone; you're getting a specialist built for one job.
How large is the Ares model, and why 14B parameters instead of a frontier-scale model?
What is Javelin, and why should I care as a customer?
What can Ares do that ChatGPT or Claude simply can't?
How do you prevent Ares from being misused or attacking systems it shouldn't?
Is my data ever used to train Ares' model?
How does Ares compare to Horizon3, XBOW, and human red teamers?
Where can Ares run, and how does deployment work?
Feel free to mail us for any enquiries : orbai@support.com
TEAM
Reach out and one of our team members will respond within 1 business day.






