Assail home

Ares vs Horizon3.ai

Two autonomous offensive platforms, built for different attack surfaces.

This page compares Horizon3.ai’s NodeZero: an autonomous network and infrastructure pentester, with Ares, an API-first offensive platform that tests web, APIs, and mobile apps as the target, not as a doorway into the network. Ares also provides attack surface management and discovers Shadow AI running in your environment, with authorized testing of supported AI services and applicable MITRE ATLAS coverage.

Request a Demo

Ares vs Horizon3.ai

Two autonomous offensive platforms, built for different attack surfaces.

This page compares Horizon3.ai’s NodeZero: an autonomous network and infrastructure pentester, with Ares, an API-first offensive platform that tests web, APIs, and mobile apps as the target, not as a doorway into the network. Ares also provides attack surface management and discovers Shadow AI running in your environment, with authorized testing of supported AI services and applicable MITRE ATLAS coverage.

Request a Demo

Ares vs Horizon3.ai

Two autonomous offensive platforms, built for different attack surfaces.

This page compares Horizon3.ai’s NodeZero: an autonomous network and infrastructure pentester, with Ares, an API-first offensive platform that tests web, APIs, and mobile apps as the target, not as a doorway into the network. Ares also provides attack surface management and discovers Shadow AI running in your environment, with authorized testing of supported AI services and applicable MITRE ATLAS coverage.

Request a Demo

What each is built for

Same discipline, different battleground.

Both platforms attack running systems autonomously and prove findings with real exploits. The difference is where they operate: NodeZero owns the network, Ares owns the application.

What Horizon3.ai is built for

Horizon3.ai built NodeZero to own the network. It runs autonomous internal, external, and cloud pentests, chains credential attacks into lateral movement, and proves how an attacker reaches domain admin. It treats the app as a pivot point into infrastructure, and web testing is still in early access.

What Ares is built for

An API-first autonomous offensive platform that tests web, APIs, and mobile apps in one platform today. Ares goes deep on access-control flaws like BOLA, follows real mobile-to-API attack chains, and returns request/response evidence with developer-ready remediation. Ares also provides attack surface management and discovers Shadow AI running in your environment, with authorized testing of supported AI services and applicable MITRE ATLAS coverage.

What each is built for

Same discipline, different battleground.

Both platforms attack running systems autonomously and prove findings with real exploits. The difference is where they operate: NodeZero owns the network, Ares owns the application.

What Horizon3.ai is built for

Horizon3.ai built NodeZero to own the network. It runs autonomous internal, external, and cloud pentests, chains credential attacks into lateral movement, and proves how an attacker reaches domain admin. It treats the app as a pivot point into infrastructure, and web testing is still in early access.

What Ares is built for

An API-first autonomous offensive platform that tests web, APIs, and mobile apps in one platform today. Ares goes deep on access-control flaws like BOLA, follows real mobile-to-API attack chains, and returns request/response evidence with developer-ready remediation. Ares also provides attack surface management and discovers Shadow AI running in your environment, with authorized testing of supported AI services and applicable MITRE ATLAS coverage.

What each is built for

Same discipline, different battleground.

Both platforms attack running systems autonomously and prove findings with real exploits. The difference is where they operate: NodeZero owns the network, Ares owns the application.

What Horizon3.ai is built for

Horizon3.ai built NodeZero to own the network. It runs autonomous internal, external, and cloud pentests, chains credential attacks into lateral movement, and proves how an attacker reaches domain admin. It treats the app as a pivot point into infrastructure, and web testing is still in early access.

What Ares is built for

An API-first autonomous offensive platform that tests web, APIs, and mobile apps in one platform today. Ares goes deep on access-control flaws like BOLA, follows real mobile-to-API attack chains, and returns request/response evidence with developer-ready remediation. Ares also provides attack surface management and discovers Shadow AI running in your environment, with authorized testing of supported AI services and applicable MITRE ATLAS coverage.

Decision snapshot

A quick read on which fits your goal.

Compare where Horizon3.ai fits for network and lateral-movement pentesting, and where Ares fits for full-stack exposure validation across web, API, and mobile. Ares also provides attack surface management and discovers Shadow AI running in your environment, with authorized testing of supported AI services and applicable MITRE ATLAS coverage.

Horizon3.ai may be a fit if…

Your primary risk lives in the internal network and Active Directory.

You need lateral-movement and domain-admin attack paths proven.

Application-layer and mobile testing can wait.

Ares may be a fit if…

You need application testing, Shadow AI discovery, and attack surface management.

APIs and mobile backends are your primary risk surface.

You need deep BOLA and OWASP API Top 10 coverage.

You need to test internal, on-prem, or air-gapped targets.

Decision snapshot

A quick read on which fits your goal.

Compare where Horizon3.ai fits for network and lateral-movement pentesting, and where Ares fits for full-stack exposure validation across web, API, and mobile. Ares also provides attack surface management and discovers Shadow AI running in your environment, with authorized testing of supported AI services and applicable MITRE ATLAS coverage.

Horizon3.ai may be a fit if…

Your primary risk lives in the internal network and Active Directory.

You need lateral-movement and domain-admin attack paths proven.

Application-layer and mobile testing can wait.

Ares may be a fit if…

You need application testing, Shadow AI discovery, and attack surface management.

APIs and mobile backends are your primary risk surface.

You need deep BOLA and OWASP API Top 10 coverage.

You need to test internal, on-prem, or air-gapped targets.

Decision snapshot

A quick read on which fits your goal.

Compare where Horizon3.ai fits for network and lateral-movement pentesting, and where Ares fits for full-stack exposure validation across web, API, and mobile. Ares also provides attack surface management and discovers Shadow AI running in your environment, with authorized testing of supported AI services and applicable MITRE ATLAS coverage.

Horizon3.ai may be a fit if…

Your primary risk lives in the internal network and Active Directory.

You need lateral-movement and domain-admin attack paths proven.

Application-layer and mobile testing can wait.

Ares may be a fit if…

You need application testing, Shadow AI discovery, and attack surface management.

APIs and mobile backends are your primary risk surface.

You need deep BOLA and OWASP API Top 10 coverage.

You need to test internal, on-prem, or air-gapped targets.

Key differences

Where the difference actually shows up.

NodeZero and Ares overlap on autonomy and exploit validation. These are the areas where coverage separates them.

Network vs application

NodeZero focuses on network attack paths. Ares combines application and supported AI testing with attack surface management and Shadow AI discovery, including applicable MITRE ATLAS coverage.

Full-stack attack chains

Ares follows the real attacker path from a mobile app into its API backend: a surface NodeZero has no way to chain from.

Access-control depth

Ares authors deep BOLA and OWASP API Top 10 coverage into the product: the access-control flaws a network pentester walks right past.

App as the prize, not a pivot

NodeZero uses the app as an entry point to infrastructure. For Ares, the application layer is the objective.

Key differences

Where the difference actually shows up.

NodeZero and Ares overlap on autonomy and exploit validation. These are the areas where coverage separates them.

Network vs application

NodeZero focuses on network attack paths. Ares combines application and supported AI testing with attack surface management and Shadow AI discovery, including applicable MITRE ATLAS coverage.

Full-stack attack chains

Ares follows the real attacker path from a mobile app into its API backend: a surface NodeZero has no way to chain from.

Access-control depth

Ares authors deep BOLA and OWASP API Top 10 coverage into the product: the access-control flaws a network pentester walks right past.

App as the prize, not a pivot

NodeZero uses the app as an entry point to infrastructure. For Ares, the application layer is the objective.

Key differences

Where the difference actually shows up.

NodeZero and Ares overlap on autonomy and exploit validation. These are the areas where coverage separates them.

Network vs application

NodeZero focuses on network attack paths. Ares combines application and supported AI testing with attack surface management and Shadow AI discovery, including applicable MITRE ATLAS coverage.

Full-stack attack chains

Ares follows the real attacker path from a mobile app into its API backend: a surface NodeZero has no way to chain from.

Access-control depth

Ares authors deep BOLA and OWASP API Top 10 coverage into the product: the access-control flaws a network pentester walks right past.

App as the prize, not a pivot

NodeZero uses the app as an entry point to infrastructure. For Ares, the application layer is the objective.

Side by side

Horizon3.ai and Ares, compared.

Both are autonomous offensive platforms. The rows below show where coverage differs.

Capability

Horizon3.ai

Ares

Primary focus

Network & infrastructure pentesting

API-first exposure validation

Product type

Offensive platform

Offensive platform

API security testing

No, network focus

Purpose-built, API-first

Web app testing

Early Access only

Purpose-built

Mobile app testing

Not in scope

Tested today

Standalone API testing

Not offered

Available today

Internal / air-gapped targets

Yes, core strength

Internal, on-prem, air-gapped

Exploit validation

Proves exploitability

Proves exploitability

Mobile-to-API attack chains

No mobile surface to chain

Follows the real attacker path

BOLA & OWASP API Top 10

Network-layer focus

Authored into product DNA

App as target vs pivot

App is a pivot into infra

App layer is the objective

Lateral movement & Active Directory

Yes, their core strength

No, app-layer by design

Built for security & engineering teams

Security & engineering

Security & engineering

Side by side

Horizon3.ai and Ares, compared.

Both are autonomous offensive platforms. The rows below show where coverage differs.

Capability

Horizon3.ai

Ares

Primary focus

Network & infrastructure pentesting

API-first exposure validation

Product type

Offensive platform

Offensive platform

API security testing

No, network focus

Purpose-built, API-first

Web app testing

Early Access only

Purpose-built

Mobile app testing

Not in scope

Tested today

Standalone API testing

Not offered

Available today

Internal / air-gapped targets

Yes, core strength

Internal, on-prem, air-gapped

Exploit validation

Proves exploitability

Proves exploitability

Mobile-to-API attack chains

No mobile surface to chain

Follows the real attacker path

BOLA & OWASP API Top 10

Network-layer focus

Authored into product DNA

App as target vs pivot

App is a pivot into infra

App layer is the objective

Lateral movement & Active Directory

Yes, their core strength

No, app-layer by design

Built for security & engineering teams

Security & engineering

Security & engineering

Side by side

Horizon3.ai and Ares, compared.

Both are autonomous offensive platforms. The rows below show where coverage differs.

Capability

Horizon3.ai

Ares

Primary focus

Network & infrastructure pentesting

API-first exposure validation

Product type

Offensive platform

Offensive platform

API security testing

No, network focus

Purpose-built, API-first

Web app testing

Early Access only

Purpose-built

Mobile app testing

Not in scope

Tested today

Standalone API testing

Not offered

Available today

Internal / air-gapped targets

Yes, core strength

Internal, on-prem, air-gapped

Exploit validation

Proves exploitability

Proves exploitability

Mobile-to-API attack chains

No mobile surface to chain

Follows the real attacker path

BOLA & OWASP API Top 10

Network-layer focus

Authored into product DNA

App as target vs pivot

App is a pivot into infra

App layer is the objective

Lateral movement & Active Directory

Yes, their core strength

No, app-layer by design

Built for security & engineering teams

Security & engineering

Security & engineering

Use-case fit

Which option fits your use case?

A quick guide to where each platform is strongest: focused web-app testing, or full-stack exposure validation across web, API, and mobile. Ares also provides attack surface management and discovers Shadow AI running in your environment, with authorized testing of supported AI services and applicable MITRE ATLAS coverage.

Network & lateral-movement pentesting

Horizon3.ai

Autonomous exposure validation

Ares

App, AI & attack surface coverage

Ares

Mobile-to-API attack chains

Ares

Internal network & domain-admin paths

Horizon3.ai

Internal, on-prem & air-gapped targets

Ares

Use-case fit

Which option fits your use case?

A quick guide to where each platform is strongest: focused web-app testing, or full-stack exposure validation across web, API, and mobile. Ares also provides attack surface management and discovers Shadow AI running in your environment, with authorized testing of supported AI services and applicable MITRE ATLAS coverage.

Network & lateral-movement pentesting

Horizon3.ai

Autonomous exposure validation

Ares

App, AI & attack surface coverage

Ares

Mobile-to-API attack chains

Ares

Internal network & domain-admin paths

Horizon3.ai

Internal, on-prem & air-gapped targets

Ares

Use-case fit

Which option fits your use case?

A quick guide to where each platform is strongest: focused web-app testing, or full-stack exposure validation across web, API, and mobile. Ares also provides attack surface management and discovers Shadow AI running in your environment, with authorized testing of supported AI services and applicable MITRE ATLAS coverage.

Network & lateral-movement pentesting

Horizon3.ai

Autonomous exposure validation

Ares

App, AI & attack surface coverage

Ares

Mobile-to-API attack chains

Ares

Internal network & domain-admin paths

Horizon3.ai

Internal, on-prem & air-gapped targets

Ares

TALK TO ASSAIL

Compare the evidence for yourself.

Discuss your evaluation criteria and how Ares fits your assessment workflow.

Your environment. Your objectives. A mission built around both.

https://api.peec.ai/agent-analytics/generic-access-log